Frequently Accessed

FDA and Kratom — Official Agency Statement

U.S. Food & Drug Administration public health summary on kratom regulation and safety

FDA determination that kratom is not lawfully marketed as a drug, dietary supplement, or food additive in the United States.

Download PDF

FDA NDI Review & Denial — Dried Kratom Leaf

Johnson Foods, LLC (2023)

U.S. Food & Drug Administration determination regarding identity, safety, and adulteration.

Download PDF

Kratom Vendor Terms of Service Admit Opioid-Like Risks

Vendor Policy Disclosure Analysis

Review of Happy Hippo Herbals Terms of Service language acknowledging opioid receptor activity, dependence risk, withdrawal symptoms, and consumer assumption of risk.

Read Analysis

Kratom: Consolidated Briefing for Lawmakers

This page provides a centralized, source-based briefing on kratom for legislators, regulators, and policy staff. It consolidates MAHA’s surveillance data, scientific literature, regulatory analysis, and legislative case studies into a single reference point.

Why this matters:
Kratom policy debates often rely on selective summaries and industry framing. This page presents primary documentation and enforcement context in one place to support informed public-health decision-making.

I. Surveillance & Harm Data

FDA Adverse Event Reporting

Poison Control & Mortality Data

Medical Examiner Data

II. Core Alkaloid & Scientific Information

III. Current Regulatory Claims & Industry Submissions

NEW

FDA Human Kratom Study: Why the Results Strengthen the Case for Schedule I

MAHA analysis of the Phase I human dose study showing opioid-like effects, statistically significant drug liking, and measurable exposure to 7-hydroxymitragynine.

NEW

Pinney Associates “Eight-Factor Analysis”

Review of the industry-funded report submitted to regulators, highlighting buried admissions about metabolism and opioid potency.

Context

2004 Opioid Testimony & Today’s Kratom Debate

Compares early opioid-era risk framing with arguments currently raised in kratom policy discussions.

NEW

Michigan HB 4969: What Lawmakers Were Told

Structured review of testimony regarding FDA posture, natural leaf claims, and 7-hydroxymitragynine distinctions.

NEW

How Kansas Was Misled to Pass the KCPA

Analysis of exhibits submitted to lawmakers and what the underlying science actually demonstrates.

IV. State Regulatory Outcomes & Enforcement Gaps

V. Scheduling, Registries & Structural Analysis

IV. Intended Use

This briefing is intended to support legislative research, regulatory review, enforcement hearings, and policy analysis. All materials are provided as primary sources or direct analyses without editorial framing.

Mothers Against Herbal Abuse (MAHA)
https://www.mothersagainstherbalabuse.org